Attempts to Cover Up The Evidence of Creation
First, let us review the information
we have examined so far:
- Antibodies latch on to antigens (enemies) entering
- A different type of antibody is produced for
- The cell is able to produce thousands of different
antibodies for thousands of different antigens.
- This production starts as soon as the enemy
enters the body and is identified.
- There is full harmony between the antigen and
the three dimensional antibody, which is produced
for that specific antigen, just as a key exactly
fits a lock.
- The cell, when required, arranges the information
it possesses in a conscious way and produces different
- While doing all this, it displays wisdom and
planning far beyond the boundaries of the human
- Certain antibodies, which are specially placed
in the mother's milk, meet the antibody need of
a baby, which is as yet unable to produce these
- The baby's stomach does not digest the antibodies,
but spares them so that they serve the baby's
Here we see a perfectly working system
in place. Inside the cells that produce the antibodies,
God placed information containing the construction
plans of these antibodies that would fill thousands
of encyclopaedia pages. Furthermore, He has given
these unconscious cells the ability to make combinations,
such as are beyond the reach of the human mind.
How do people who blindly believe
in evolution explain the existence of such a perfect
system? The answer is very simple: they cannot.
The only thing they do is put forward
illogical assumptions which strongly self-contradict.
There are many imaginary scenarios without any scientific
validity that are solely directed towards finding
an answer to the question of "How can we explain this
system in terms of evolution?".
The most popular of these scenarios
maintains that the immune system evolved from a single
antibody. Here is the summary of this scenario which
has no scientific basis:
Initially the defence system comprised
of a single gene that produced a single type of immunoglobulin
(a kind of protein). But this gene "rapidly created
copies of itself (!)" and developed these copies so
that they formed a different molecule of immunoglobulin.
Then the control mechanisms developed that monitor
the manufacturing of different genes which possess
the ability to re-combine".
This example is important in seeing
how shaky are the grounds the theory of evolution
is built on, and in understanding the brainwashing
and window-dressing methods evolutionists frequently
have recourse to. Now let us examine this deceit sentence
"Initially the defence system comprised of a single
gene that produced a single type of immunoglobulin
(a kind of protein)."
The first question that must be asked
"By whom was this inaugural gene
Evolutionists try to present this
stage as an insignificant detail and circumvent it.
However, how this initial gene has originated must
be explained. It is scientifically impossible for
a gene to have formed by itself. The impossibility
of the coincidental formation of the gene sequence
is a fact which has been admitted by evolutionist
scientists many times. We can give an example from
Prof. Ali Demirsoy, a Turkish evolutionist, on this
That is, if life
requires a certain sequence, it can be said that this
has a probability likely to be realised once in the
whole universe. Otherwise some metaphysical powers
beyond our definition must have acted in its formation.5
Yet evolutionists cover up this point
and make a senseless presupposition such as "whatever
the argument, there surely was a gene at the beginning."
As is quite evident, the scenario collapses right
at the first step.
"But this gene "rapidly created copies of itself (!)"
and developed these copies so that they formed a different
molecule of immunoglobulin."
Though impossible, let us suppose
that there was a gene at the beginning. Though it
is utterly impossible for this first gene to have
formed by itself, evolutionists make statements, lacking
any logical basis such as "it created copies of itself."
Such statements, which have no scientific value, constitute
a good example of the window-dressing style of the
evolutionists. A hypothesis assuming that a gene created
and developed different copies of itself complies
neither with the rules of logic nor with scientific
Moreover, the antibodies produced
by such an imaginary gene, which has supposedly formed
by itself, and its copies, have to possess such properties
and structure as will stop the antigens coming from
the external world. This means that the same Creator,
that is, God created both antigens and the genes
that are responsible for producing antibodies for
"Then the control mechanisms developed that manage
the manufacturing of different genes which possess
the ability to re-combine.
Unable to explain even the working
principles of these control and combination mechanisms,
evolutionists evade the issue by saying that "this
system brought itself into being" whenever it serves
their purpose. They do not attempt to describe how
such an incredible system developed by itself as a
result of coincidences. When they try to bring some
explanations of their own to these issues, they cannot
put forward anything but fabricated and ridiculous
scenarios. By doing so, they expose their weakness,
and the unreasonableness of the claim they make.
So great is the wisdom displayed
in these control mechanisms that approximately two
million differently structured products are fabricated
from thousands of combinations of units of information.
Yet, as mentioned before, neither the cell, nor any
system within the cell has the ability to "learn"
and "develop". Moreover, the cell makes these information
combinations by selecting only the right ones out
of infinite possibilities. Therefore, this requires
a much more conscious and reasonable selecting mechanism.
Those who make such a claim may well
advance the following theories for any given product
that is manufactured by technology or the human mind:
"Stone tablets created themselves
and later developed into computers on their own."
"Kites that have created themselves later developed
into jet planes."
The above sentences would sound absolutely
absurd to any national person. However, even these
sentences are much more logical than saying that the
elements of the defence system, the working principles
of which have not even been discovered, emerged by
What is more, the presence of antibodies
alone is not sufficient to protect the human body.
For the defence system to operate, and for the human
being to survive, macrophages, helper T cells, killer
T cells, suppressor T cells, memory cells, B cells
and many other factors must work in cooperation.
Ali Demirsoy, Kalitim ve Evrim (Inheritance and Evolution),
Ankara: Meteksan Publishing, p. 61